Skip to content

Solutions · Wi-Fi OEMs

Your radio wins the design, or a generic profile does

The design that sets the bill of materials rarely happens in your tool. It happens in somebody else's, where your access point arrives as a generic profile — and the engineering you paid for stops existing at the moment a specifier is choosing.

What happens today

Three places your specification gets lost

None of these is anyone's fault. They are just where the datasheet stops travelling.

Your own design tool

plans your access points properly

The seam

it only plans yours — the integrator designing a mixed building with cameras, cabling and power is not in it

A third-party predictive tool

where the design that sets the BOM actually happens

The seam

your radio arrives as a generic profile or a stale library entry, and your advantage flattens

The datasheet

your differentiation, in writing

The seam

it rarely reaches the model that decides which AP is specified

No invented numbers

Your radio, read from your datasheet

AP radio specifications are datasheet-driven, against IEEE 802.11ax and 802.11be. The rule underneath matters more than the feature: named hardware without usable datasheet radio data is planned generically and disclosed as such — never assigned fabricated numbers. A tool that quietly invents a plausible figure for a radio it does not know produces a design that looks finished, specifies somebody, and is wrong where nobody looks.

  • Datasheet-driven AP radio specs (IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11be)
  • Hardware without usable datasheet data is planned generically AND disclosed — never given invented figures
  • Per-band heatmap exports in 2D and 3D, so band-specific behaviour is visible rather than averaged
The coverage physics, in depth

Where the numbers come from

Radio specs
the published datasheet
No data
generic, and labelled generic
Never
a fabricated figure
Output
per-band, 2D and 3D

DFS and 6 GHz

The bands your newest radio sells on

Channel planning covers DFS eligibility and 6 GHz channels, applied against the regulatory frame rather than a simplification of it. If your advantage is a 6 GHz radio or a better DFS story, it shows up where the design is decided instead of on a comparison sheet nobody opens at bid time.

  • Channel planning with DFS eligibility and 6 GHz channels (AFC availability is not evaluated yet)
  • Regulatory grounding: 47 CFR 15.407, FCC 14-30, ISED RSS-247, ETSI EN 300 328
  • AP auto-planner with per-zone RF parameter overrides and per-zone redundancy planning, which discloses spare AP counts

Spectrum handling

DFS
eligibility modelled
6 GHz
channels planned; AFC not evaluated yet
Per zone
RF parameter overrides
Redundancy
spare AP counts disclosed

ITU-R, not a fudge factor

Propagation your engineers can argue with

One predictive propagation engine feeds the heatmap, the planner, the walkthrough and the remediation — so there is a single calculation chain to interrogate rather than four that disagree. Path loss, diffraction and material reflection follow published models, and wall attenuation is per material and per band.

  • Standards-based path loss, diffraction and material reflection (ITU-R P.1238, P.526, P.2040, P.1411)
  • Multi-edge diffraction by the Deygout method per ITU-R P.526 §4.5.4, alongside knife-edge and UTD
  • Per-material, per-band wall attenuation (NIST IR 6055)
  • Field calibration — measured versus predicted RSSI correction — and deterministic walkthrough remediation with no AI in the calculation
See the platform

The chain

Path loss
ITU-R P.1238 / P.1411
Diffraction
knife-edge · UTD · Deygout
Materials
NIST IR 6055, per band
Calibration
measured vs predicted RSSI

Named standards, and the one approximation

Every claim here maps to a shipped capability. Antenna shape is parametric rather than imported, and that is on the board rather than in a footnote.

IEEE 802.11be
radio specs from your datasheet
with 802.11ax, under a no-invented-numbers rule
6 GHz
channel planning with DFS eligibility
47 CFR 15.407 · FCC 14-30 · ISED RSS-247 · ETSI EN 300 328
ITU-R
path loss, diffraction and reflection
P.1238 · P.526 · P.2040 · P.1411
Parametric
antenna shape, not imported patterns
the one approximation — see the questions below

Wi-Fi OEM questions

Do you import our antenna radiation pattern files?

Not today, and for an antenna vendor this is the answer that matters most. The model uses the gain and beamwidth in each product record rather than a pattern file, and an access point with no beamwidth on file is modelled equally in every direction; the design proposal and site plan set say which applies. Two numbers are not a radiation pattern, and you know that better than anyone reading this page — so it is stated here rather than left for you to discover. Everything else on this page is computed from your published specifications.

How is our AP modelled if the datasheet is thin?

Generically, and labelled as such. The rule is explicit: named hardware without usable datasheet radio data is planned generically and disclosed, never assigned fabricated numbers. That protects you more than it protects us — an invented figure in a design is a specification decision made on a number nobody can source.

Does a 6 GHz or DFS advantage actually show up in the design?

Yes, with one caveat. Channel planning covers DFS eligibility and 6 GHz channels, grounded in 47 CFR 15.407, FCC 14-30, ISED RSS-247 and ETSI EN 300 328; AFC availability is not evaluated yet, and a plan is applied, not reverted. The planner also supports per-zone RF parameter overrides and per-zone redundancy planning, which discloses spare AP counts.

Can we measure a site to validate the model?

Field calibration corrects predicted RSSI against measured values, so a model can be tuned to a real building. What is not built: measured survey capture from dedicated hardware, and RF spectrum analysis. Site data is entered or predicted, not captured from measurement equipment — if measurement is the requirement, a dedicated instrument remains the right tool.

Get your radio specified on its merits

Bring a datasheet and a floor plan, and see how your access point is modelled.